Sunday, October 3, 2010

The Age of the Angle



I like people more than I let on, sometimes.  But I am petty, and tend to envy the successful, while befriending the plain.  The plain are no threat to me, you know.  But from whence the envy? 

I am not a particularly hard working guy.  I get by, but there is perhaps a bit more leisure in my life than my father would appreciate.  Sign of the times.  He worked more, I work less.  It'll keep going this way until my great great grandchildren will be hobbled if they are caught with a shovel or a manual transmission or a lever.  No more worky-worky for you.  Because it is increasingly the Age of the Angle, and the Angle is all about the simplest, most effortless way to accomplish something. Or to exempt yourself from the same.  And I envy, or am angered by, the successful, because most of them got there by way of the Angle.

In the military, "orders" stopped being good enough.  They had to become "lawful" orders, because someone found the Angle, and used it to get off the hook for being a crook.  Easy out.

You can't buy a sponge without three paragraphs of disclaimers, because someone found the Angle, and used it to sue the pants off of whoever makes sponges.  Easy money.

And in the media, from books to blogs to blockbuster movies, you can't enjoy yourself because everyone has found the Angle, and have been using it to harvest dollars and droning audiences by the millions.  Easy audience.

What's today's angle?   Hate.  Spite.  Vitriol.  Effortless and reflexive, and as disinterested in talent as rap music.  Couched in silly little phrases like "fiscal responsibility."  "Sustainability."  "Economic stewardship."  Just a bunch of garbage terms invented as a platform to tell people why someone else should be tirelessly derided, and your money should go elsewhere.  Pundits, movie producers, politicians, authors.  The most successful ones are just sitting there hating the other guy all day long.  It is the definition of politics - "the other guy is a jerk" - and politics is only made up of the ones who are good at it.  Good at spending their days demonstrating that somebody you know needs to find his way to the bottom of the sea.  Morning noon and night, three squares a day of "I hate that guy, and you should, too."  We aren't being brought down as a society by a lack of education, poor architecture, irresponsible lending, or greed for oil.  We're being brought down by our dogged and constantly accelerating pursuit of demonstrating, announcing, and assembling our hatred for the people around us.  Let's gather the top 10 political or "issues based (whatever)" news people of the left and right, put them in my honesty machine, and ask them if they really think they are doing something good for the country and the world.  Guaranteed answer is 'No."  And they will probably add: "But we're banking on the fact that we can convince you we are, because this stuff is easy, and it is making us rich."

The only thing easier than doing it, is bemoaning that it is being done.  And here I sit.  Yes, I suppose there is some hypocrisy, or irony, or self-fulfilling/self-destructing absurdity to coming on here and complaining about it, but what's a fella to do?  Watch old movies?  Dig a hole?  Go for a drive?  Seminary?  I know, I know, you want me to be ashamed of buying a lamp from Pottery Barn, and you want me to grow my own food, and you want me to profess a love for guns, and you want me to say that cops are evil, and you want me to say that Police Officers are heroes, and you want me to admit that I am a racist, and you want me to be heartened by the poll results - but not that poll over there, and you want me to build my own house, and you want me to think Ayn Rand is more important than my parents, and you want me to put a Che Guevara onesie on my baby, and you want me to give cyclists three feet, and you want me to compost, and you want me to drive an electric car, and you want me to drive a V-12, and you want me to attend "non-political" rallies held by a partisan lightning rod on the steps of memorials to our founding politicians in our nation's political capital.

That's a lot to get right.

And what's my angle?  Mine all seem to have been drawn up and delivered by MC Escher - a little on the uncertain side.  Sitting here wailing against my ineptitude as an honest man in a dishonest world?  Presupposing failure and excusing it, all in one swing.  That's economy of motion for you, kids.

15 comments:

Buck said...

That's economy of motion for you, kids.

Quite a nice rant, too. But one must guard against excessive cynicism. A little goes a long way.

Andy said...

Oh I know. And there is always a little beating I give myself when I give in to the urge to get all whiny like this. Still, it comes to a head sometimes, so I have to purge the tanks a bit.

Buckskins Rule said...

Good post, Andy. It says quite a bit, all of it truthful. At times one can be a bit overwhelmed by what "they" want us to be.

I've grown out of envy for the rich. They might have more money and lots of stuff, but I don't think it makes them any happier. I still surround myself with the plain, like yourself. They tend to be happier people.

Andy said...

Thanks, BR. You seem pretty happy in your own right.

Buckskins Rule said...

You know, Andy, I am happy. It took the first 40 years of my life to realize it. Upon that realization, it felt as though a great weight was lifted from my shoulders.

Kris, in New England said...

I surround myself with the plain as well, which makes sense as I consider myself to be one of them.

I'm with BR - I don't envy the rich because while it is nice to have disposable income - I agree that it just can't buy the kind of happiness that I expect from life these days.

It's the quiet pursuits - a lovely sunday drive after church, a quiet evening playing Cribbage with The Oracle, an afternoon spent sitting on our back deck, reading and enjoying the beauty around us.

Money can't buy you those experiences; time with friends and family are the things that matter most.

Jewel said...

I'm keeping my expectations realistic. I'm going to work for the rest of my life, I'm going to live simply, buy second hand things, which is all right with me. And just hunker down for the winter.

Andy said...

Andy, I was doing pretty good with following all of this. But, Thomas' comment lost me.

But, you'd better get a staff member on it anyway. I know that there are some true believers out there that truly hurt for their cause, so I can't eat the whole pie.

But, many (in politics, religion, etc.) have certainly found an angle. Nothing new. Has always been so throughout history, and will be when the final chapter gets wrote!

Daphne said...

Brilliant piece, Andy.

Take sides or be sidelined. About says it all in the current political, social, cultural wars America seems intent on waging in every venue imaginable.

No room for independent thinking. God forbid you hold contempt for half a dozen over there or three dozen over here. You must walk some imaginary line of groupthink affiliation and forever hold your dissenting thoughts, lest you be cast out as a subversive asshole.

You're not whiny, just saying out loud what many people are thinking and feeling these days.

Andy said...

Don't listen to her, Andy.

You're whiny. Nyuk...

I'm going to saddle up, and be contrary. (Completely out of character for me).

Certainly, I am tired of the constant nya nya nya on both sides. But, just because I agree with those on the right about 90% of the time, that does not exclude me from being a "free thinker."

"Free thinkers" often come to the correct conclusion. Certainly, I do not trust myself any further than I can shot-put Michael Angelo's David. But I can look at facts, and more often than not, they don't change. They are stubborn thangs!

The reason I said before that I can't eat the whole pie here is that whether one has chosen a cause as an "angle" to soak up moolah (we're lookin' at you Al Gore, and Benny Hinn...or whoever the latest shyster in the religious world is), or not...the messenger is not important.

At least he/she is not important to me. Let's just go with right-wing pundits here.

Sure, Hannity (who truly grates on my nerves), Ann Coulter, Limbaugh (well, you really can't count him, because he's got enough money to burn a wet mule), Beck, and a cast of thousands all have a personal financial stake in riling up the masses.

But does that mean that their "cause" is no less right, and true? Not in my mind. Because facts bear out what they say/write/whatever.

And, I do not find them to be hypocritical in their lifestyles. They are all promoting prosperity, and living prosperous lives.

OTOH, we've got those on the left that nag at us about using plastic bags, and driving cars that destroy the planet, and forcing legislation to require us to live with high fuel prices, a bunch of crap for light, heat, and "iffy" electrical power that would NEVER imagine themselves under said regulations...all the while investing in favored industries, and getting fat at our expense.

The difference is that the left makes a charade of their concern...shrouding it in "good for the planet" crap.

The right calls it out as crap, and sells their books.

So, I know a real shyster when I see one. And, what this pitifully long, boring comment boils down to is this: You can be a true believer, and still honestly make a living selling a product that you truly believe in.

Not everyone is a "user." I mean, if a Maytag washing machine salesman has an obviously superior Whirlpool at the house, while trying to convince every customer he meets that they should buy a crappy Maytag...well, he's a shyster.

But, if he owns a crappy Maytag and believes in it...I can respect that. That's why I can't respect the left.

Man, that comment really did not make one bit of sense at all.

I guess I'm sundowning...

Andy said...

Wow, guys, thanks for the fantastic responses.

(The Other) Andy, that was wonderful. I can think of a dozen people I have met on the internet who would have responded to this post with a bunch of smoke-blowing that in the end would have really just been interpreted as "I run in important circles, and your blog doesn't have as many degrees as mine!"

You, on the other hand, bring a genuine and extremely useful perspective and explanation, and I can't thank you enough. Give yourself some credit, for crying out loud!

Daphne, thanks. It honestly does feel like whining, but that's only because I haven't found the eloquence (or the angle) to turn it from whining to well-informed dissent. The only difference between the two is who comes to your cocktail parties.

Andy said...

Andy, I went back and looked at my comment. I was hungry at the time, but have eaten two huge bowls of homemade potato soup since then.

I'm feeling much better now, so please pay no attention to what was previously written. A hungry man can "talk all out his head!"

Buck said...

Nothing to do with this post, but... Good on yer Avs. Do ya think Chicago is missing Niemi right about now? Turco's shittiness aside, your Avs looked good. Srsly.

OP said...

@(The Other)Andy. Actually, what you said was brilliant and spot on, particularly this:

The difference is that the left makes a charade of their concern...shrouding it in "good for the planet" crap.

And it's not just environmentalism.

It's for "the good of the children" or "I'm for kids" sloganeering on public eduction. In truth, it has been liberal policies and leaders that have continued to fail in public education at every turn. (The Department of Education, perhaps the worst aspect of Jimmy Carter's horrific legacy.) Yet, the majority of electorate, wanting to do "something good" or "feel good" about their vote, continue to buy into this garbage simply because they have become so indoctrinated by the sloganeering.

Facts? Who has time for them? Even the simple ones, like, who has controlled inner school system for decades (liberals)? And how are those school doing? Answer: Epic failure. Yet, it's "let for the left because they care about kids!". I want to bang my head on my keyboard.

It extends to other aspects as well.

It's for the good of society that we have social programs for deaf lepers.

It's for the good of all that we have universal health care for people who don't need or want it.

And on and on and on.

So, The Other Andy, I;m going to correct you and say that it's more than a charade;,it's a ruse because this game hides what they're really thinking, which is, "I know what's best for you The Other Andy. More than you could ever know, you impossible simpleton." Utterly insulting from a movement professing to be "for the common man."

And thing is, I used to be just like that. I still owe apologies for being that person at one time.

Andy said...

Awwwww...

OP, don't beat up on yourself for the former days. And, make no apologies.

We ALL are where we are, and who we are at various times in life.

And, your "charade v. ruse" deal is spot on, too. I guess I need to buy me a dictionary...but, you got the terminology down pat!